Fund Fee Calculator
Saving & InvestingTwo funds, the same market return, different fees: the wealth gap a TER difference opens over decades.
€76,097
31.5% of the larger final value
€165,597
€43,712 charged in fees
€241,694
€5,696 charged in fees
51%
Fund B consumes 6%
Two funds, one market return
- Fund B (0.2% fee)
- Fund A (2% fee)
Area chart of both fund balances by year. The region between the two curves is the wealth gap opened by the fee difference.
Decade milestones
The fees paid grow more slowly than the difference between the funds. The rest of the gap is the growth those fees never earned.
| Year | Fund A value | Fund A fees paid | Fund B value | Fund B fees paid | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | €43,793 | €5,147 | €49,697 | €563 | €5,903 |
| 20 | €93,242 | €18,457 | €119,378 | €2,193 | €26,137 |
| 30 | €165,597 | €43,712 | €241,694 | €5,696 | €76,097 |
How this calculator works
This calculator runs the same investment plan through two funds that differ only in their annual fee, the total expense ratio (TER) you find in every fund's key information document. Both funds earn the gross market return you set; each fund's net return is then (1 + return) x (1 - fee) - 1. That multiplication matters: the fee is charged on your assets, not deducted from the return, so a 2% TER on a market that earned 6% costs slightly more than two points, every year, on an ever larger balance. Contributions are added at the end of each month and both funds compound monthly.
The results separate two numbers that are often confused. The fees paid are what the fund actually charged, month by month, on your balance. The wealth difference at the horizon is larger, because every unit taken in fees also stops compounding for all the years that follow; the gap between the two curves contains the fees plus all the growth they never earned. The growth consumed figure benchmarks each fund against the same plan with no fee at all, following Sharpe's arithmetic of active management: before costs, the average invested amount earns the market return, so after costs it must earn less, and the only question is how much less.
The comparison deliberately holds the gross return equal for both funds, which is the evidence-based default rather than a simplification: decades of SPIVA scorecards show that most expensive funds do not out-earn cheap index funds over long horizons. The projection is still a scenario, not a forecast: real returns arrive unevenly, and taxes, entry fees, and trading costs are not included. Take the TER of your actual fund and of the alternative you are considering from their documents, and use the wealth difference to judge whether the expensive fund earns its keep.
Frequently asked questions
How does the calculator turn a fund fee into a net return?
Multiplicatively: net return = (1 + gross return) x (1 - fee) - 1. A 6% market return with a 2% TER leaves (1.06)(0.98) - 1 = 3.88%, not the 4% a simple subtraction would suggest, because the fee is charged on the whole balance, including that year's growth. The difference between 3.88% and 4% looks trivial in one year, but the calculator compounds it monthly over the full horizon, which is where the headline gap comes from. At a 0% market return the fee still bites: the balance shrinks by roughly the TER each year.
Why is the wealth difference larger than the fees actually paid?
Because a fee has two costs: the charge itself and the compounding that charge never earns afterwards. If a fund takes 200 from your balance in year five, you do not just lose 200; you lose what those 200 would have grown into over the remaining twenty-five years. The calculator shows both numbers separately: the cumulative fees are the sum of the monthly charges on your balance, and the wealth difference between the two funds adds the foregone growth on top. Over long horizons the foregone growth typically becomes the larger of the two parts.
Don't expensive funds earn higher returns that justify the fee?
The evidence says that most do not. S&P's SPIVA scorecards, which compare active funds against their benchmark index year after year, find that over 15 years more than 90% of US large-cap active funds underperformed the S&P 500, and results across other regions and categories are similar. William Sharpe's 1991 paper The Arithmetic of Active Management explains why: before costs, the average actively managed amount must earn exactly the market return, so after costs the average active fund must lag by roughly its fees. A particular fund can beat the market, but picking it in advance is the hard part, while the fee is guaranteed.
What is a TER and where do I find it?
The total expense ratio (also shown as ongoing charges) is the annual cost of running the fund, expressed as a percentage of your invested assets and deducted automatically from the fund's value, which is why it never appears on a statement as a separate line. You find it in the fund's key information document and factsheet, usually near the label ongoing costs or ongoing charges. Enter each fund's figure here; if a fund also charges entry, exit, or performance fees, those come on top and this calculator does not model them.
What does the growth consumed figure mean?
It measures each fund against a zero-fee version of the same plan. The zero-fee plan turns your contributions into a certain amount of growth; the fund's fees and their foregone compounding eat a share of that growth, and the figure is that share. For example, 50% means half of the growth the market offered ended up absorbed by costs rather than in your pocket. When the gross return is zero there is no growth to measure against, so the calculator shows the absolute amounts only.
What does this calculator not include?
It models the ongoing fee only, applied to a smooth, constant market return. It excludes entry and exit fees, performance fees, broker and platform charges, bid-ask spreads, index tracking difference, and all taxes on gains or distributions, which vary by country; check what applies to you. It also assumes both funds earn the same gross return, which is the long-run evidence-based baseline but not a certainty for any specific pair of funds. Real returns fluctuate, so the curves are scenarios, not forecasts.
These calculators are for educational purposes only and are not financial advice. Always consult a qualified financial advisor, mortgage professional, or your bank before making a commitment.
Support this project
If a simulation saved you money, or a bad decision, you can support the project.